Blog

Kazakhstan International Child Abduction – Beware of AI

Today I checked whether the United States was in a treaty relationship with Kazakhstan. 

Unfortunately, my Google searches now take me first to Google AI, which is completely unreliable and dangerous.

Here’s what it told me:

“AI Overview:

Kazakhstan acceded to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) in 2013, but the United States initially had an objection, meaning the Convention didn’t apply between the two countries. However, the U.S. withdrew this objection in May 2024, making the Convention effective between the two nations for international child abduction cases. Parents with a child abducted to Kazakhstan can now use the Convention’s mechanisms to seek their return.” 

In fact, AI mixed up the Hague Abduction Convention with the Hague Child Support Convention. 

In 2019, the Office of Child Support Services notified child support agencies that the United States had objected to the accession of Kazakhstan to the Hague Child Support Convention. On May 14, 2024, the U.S. Department of State delivered a notice of withdrawal of that objection to the Convention depositary, which then notified all Convention countries on May 21, 2024.

But the State Department’s refusal to accept Kazakhstan as a Hague Abduction Convention treaty partner continues. The list of countries that are in such a treaty relationship is available at the HCCH website

The Abduction Convention has no role to play in respect to child abductions between the United States and Kazakhstan.

Beware of AI!

And be alert in respect of potential child visits to Kazakhstan.

Share

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Country-by-Country Information About Child Abduction and Divorce
(Click to find your country)

Our Articles

Learn More

Contact Our Firm

IMPORTANT: WE REQUIRE SPECIFIC INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR SITUATION OR WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RESPOND.
POTENTIAL CLIENTS SHOULD NOT SEND ANY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION UNTIL SUCH TIME AS AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY A WRITTEN RETAINER AGREEMENT SIGNED BY BOTH THE ATTORNEY AND THE CLIENT. SENDING AN EMAIL DOES NOT CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP OR CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATE THE LAW OFFICE OF JEREMY D. MORLEY TO REPRESENT YOU, REGARDLESS OF THE CONTENT OF SUCH INQUIRY.


Post Views: 220